Like what you've seen so far? Check out Best of The Urban Muse for a list of popular posts, and be sure to grab the RSS feed.

Sunday, September 7, 2008

Writing for Print vs. Web

It's not enough to simply add a few links to a print article and call it a day. Online writing requires a different mindset and a different approach. Here are a few of the major differences.

Length: Since online publishers don’t have to pay for printing, you would think that web-only articles would be longer than those in traditional media. But usually they’re shorter, because most people don’t have the time or inclination to read a 5,000 word masterpiece on their computer monitor. Most of my online articles are 500-800 words, but I often write 1,200-1,500 words for print. Sentences and paragraphs for the web must also be short so that readers can scan.

Turnaround time: Print publications can take a long time to put together (most glossy magazines plan at least six months in advance). Not so with online publications. If you’re writing on a blog, you can publish things instantly. If you’re writing for a website, you’ll sometimes see your article published within a week or sooner after you send it to your editor. Instant writing clips!

Format: Even when you have a long article online (say, on Salon.com or Bankrate.com), it will almost always get broken into small bite-sized portions on multiple webpages. That way, readers with short attention spans won’t get overwhelmed by a huge block of text (like those deceptively short lines at Disneyland). Many websites and magazines use sub-headings to break up their articles. Lists, bullet points, or bolding key phrases are other favorite strategies. I would not underline text unless it’s a link, because that could confuse readers.

Titles: A title that includes carefully chosen keywords helps users find relevant content and boosts search engine rankings. For instance, a headline for a print article might use a pun (for instance, Exercising Self-Discipline appeared in The Boston Globe in January, 2008), but online titles tend to be more literal. That same article appeared on the writer’s blog as 5 Ways to Meet a Very Big Goal. Online readers (and women’s magazine editors) like lists because they’re organized and easy to read. Search engines and social bookmarking sites like them, too.

Multi-media: Magazines can illustrate their articles with photography or graphics, but websites often include interactive quizzes, slide shows, podcasts, web links, videos, forums, and countless other features. Generally, you don’t need to be a tech wizard, but understanding each of these items is helpful.

Any other differences you've noticed? Do you prefer writing for print or the web?

2 comments:

Mark said...

Thanks Susan. As you say "Online writing requires a different mindset and a different approach." The result is changing the way we read and think as we read more web copy than print copy. There's an interesting article titled 'Is Google Making Us Stupid?' at http://www.theatlantic.com/
doc/200807/google that does a good job of covering this topic. The second, third, and fourth paragraphs of the article are copied below to give you a preview of this lengthy piece.

"I can feel it, too. Over the past few years I’ve had an uncomfortable sense that someone, or something, has been tinkering with my brain, remapping the neural circuitry, reprogramming the memory. My mind isn’t going—so far as I can tell—but it’s changing. I’m not thinking the way I used to think. I can feel it most strongly when I’m reading. Immersing myself in a book or a lengthy article used to be easy. My mind would get caught up in the narrative or the turns of the argument, and I’d spend hours strolling through long stretches of prose. That’s rarely the case anymore. Now my concentration often starts to drift after two or three pages. I get fidgety, lose the thread, begin looking for something else to do. I feel as if I’m always dragging my wayward brain back to the text. The deep reading that used to come naturally has become a struggle.

I think I know what’s going on. For more than a decade now, I’ve been spending a lot of time online, searching and surfing and sometimes adding to the great databases of the Internet. The Web has been a godsend to me as a writer. Research that once required days in the stacks or periodical rooms of libraries can now be done in minutes. A few Google searches, some quick clicks on hyperlinks, and I’ve got the telltale fact or pithy quote I was after. Even when I’m not working, I’m as likely as not to be foraging in the Web’s info-thickets’reading and writing e-mails, scanning headlines and blog posts, watching videos and listening to podcasts, or just tripping from link to link to link. (Unlike footnotes, to which they’re sometimes likened, hyperlinks don’t merely point to related works; they propel you toward them.)

For me, as for others, the Net is becoming a universal medium, the conduit for most of the information that flows through my eyes and ears and into my mind. The advantages of having immediate access to such an incredibly rich store of information are many, and they’ve been widely described and duly applauded. “The perfect recall of silicon memory,” Wired’s Clive Thompson has written, “can be an enormous boon to thinking.” But that boon comes at a price. As the media theorist Marshall McLuhan pointed out in the 1960s, media are not just passive channels of information. They supply the stuff of thought, but they also shape the process of thought. And what the Net seems to be doing is chipping away my capacity for concentration and contemplation. My mind now expects to take in information the way the Net distributes it: in a swiftly moving stream of particles. Once I was a scuba diver in the sea of words. Now I zip along the surface like a guy on a Jet Ski."

Amanda Nicole said...

They really are different worlds, writing for the web and for print. I do both regularly, and find that if I have to work on both types of projects in the same day, I have to take a break in between and clear my brain so that I'm not thinking in short , clipped key words while writing for a mag, and not getting long-winded while writing website copy.

Great post, and best of luck with the seminar!

Related Posts with Thumbnails